Dong Quai
Angelica sinensis
Evidence Rating
Confidence Level
Traditions
Last Updated
Summary
Dong Quai (Angelica sinensis) is one of the most important herbs in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for women's health, earning the title "female ginseng." However, from the European evidence-based phytotherapy perspective, it represents the weakest herb in this collection. The EMA/HMPC explicitly REJECTED adoption of a monograph due to inadequate evidence of 30+ years of use in the EU, toxicological concerns, and the need for medical supervision. There is no Commission E monograph. The only major RCT as a standalone treatment (Hirata 1997, n=71) showed no benefit over placebo for menopausal symptoms. Significant safety concerns exist regarding anticoagulant interactions (documented potentiation of warfarin) and photosensitivity due to coumarin and furanocoumarin content. Dong Quai represents the largest gap between traditional reputation and evidence-based validation in this collection.
Drug Interactions
This herb has significant drug interactions. Do not use if you are taking medications without consulting a healthcare provider first. See detailed interaction information below.
Regulatory Status
| Regulatory Body | Status |
|---|---|
| Commission E (Germany) | âś“ Approved |
| ESCOP (European) | âś“ Approved |
| EMA/HMPC (EU) | âś“ Approved |
Metadata
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Common Names (English) | Dong Quai, Dang Gui, Danggui, Chinese Angelica, Female Ginseng |
| Common Names (German) | Chinesische Angelika, Dong Quai |
| Botanical Name | Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels |
| Plant Family | Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) |
| Part Used | Root (Angelicae sinensis radix) |
| Evidence Quality Rating | Weak — No EU monograph adopted; no Commission E monograph; single negative RCT as monotherapy; primarily TCM tradition |
Approved Indications
Commission E (Germany)
- No Commission E monograph exists for Angelica sinensis
ESCOP
- No ESCOP monograph exists for Angelica sinensis
EMA/HMPC
- Status: MONOGRAPH REJECTED (2013)
- Assessment report: EMA/HMPC/614586/2012 (July 2013)
- Reasons for rejection:
- Inadequate evidence of at least 30 years of medicinal use, including at least 15 years within the European Union
- Preliminary evidence of toxicological concerns in relation to phytochemistry
- Use requiring supervision of a medical practitioner (incompatible with traditional use registration)
- Current EU status: Available only as food/dietary supplement under Directive 2002/46/EC
Health Canada
- Has issued a monograph with indications: traditionally used in herbal medicine as a blood tonic and to promote blood circulation; to relieve dysmenorrhea, irregular menstruation, and menopausal symptoms
Agreement/Disagreement Between Bodies
- Unanimous European rejection: No major European regulatory body has adopted Dong Quai
- Contrast with TCM: In TCM pharmacopeias, Dong Quai is a first-tier gynecological herb
- Health Canada: More permissive, acknowledging traditional use
- This divergence between TCM tradition and European regulatory assessment is the defining feature of Dong Quai’s profile
Conditions Treated
Traditional (TCM Framework)
- Blood deficiency syndromes: Amenorrhea, dysmenorrhea, irregular menstruation
- Blood stasis: Trauma, pain, abscesses
- Intestinal dryness: Constipation
- Used in combination: Almost always combined with other herbs in TCM formulas (Dang Gui Bu Xue Tang, Si Wu Tang, etc.)
- Not typically used as single herb in TCM
Marketed Uses in Western Context
- Menstrual cramps / dysmenorrhea
- Menstrual irregularities
- Menopausal symptoms
- General “female tonic”
- Anemia (traditional claim)
Evidence Assessment
- Menopausal symptoms (monotherapy): Negative — single RCT showed no benefit
- Dysmenorrhea: No controlled trials as monotherapy [NEEDS-RESEARCH]
- Menstrual irregularities: Anecdotal and traditional only; no controlled evidence
- In combination formulas: Some positive evidence from TCM formula studies, but effects cannot be attributed to Dong Quai alone
Mechanism of Action
Specific Compounds
| Compound Class | Key Compounds | Activity |
|---|---|---|
| Coumarins | Osthole, bergapten, psoralen, xanthotoxin | Anticoagulant, antispasmodic, photosensitizing |
| Furanocoumarins | Psoralen, bergapten, imperatorin | Photosensitivity; potential carcinogenicity with UV |
| Phthalides | Ligustilide (major), butylidenephthalide | Antispasmodic (smooth muscle), possible uterine relaxant |
| Ferulic acid | Ferulic acid | Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiplatelet |
| Polysaccharides | Angelica polysaccharides | Immunomodulatory, hematopoietic (basis for “blood tonic” claim) |
Proposed Mechanisms
- Uterine smooth muscle effects: Ligustilide and butylidenephthalide may have antispasmodic effects on uterine muscle — could explain traditional use for dysmenorrhea
- Estrogenic activity: Disputed. Some in vitro studies suggest weak estrogenic binding; the Hirata 1997 RCT found no estrogenic effects (no change in endometrial thickness, vaginal maturation, FSH, estradiol)
- Hematopoietic effects: Polysaccharides may stimulate blood cell production — this aligns with TCM “blood tonic” concept
- Anticoagulant activity: Coumarins and ferulic acid inhibit platelet aggregation
- Antioxidant: Ferulic acid and related compounds
Critical Assessment of Mechanism
- No clearly established mechanism for menopausal symptom relief
- Estrogenic hypothesis not confirmed in the only adequate clinical trial
- Antispasmodic mechanism for dysmenorrhea is plausible but untested in humans
- Most evidence is from in vitro or animal studies, with very limited clinical translation
Clinical Evidence Summary
The Key Trial: Hirata et al. 1997
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Design | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled |
| N | 71 postmenopausal women |
| Duration | 24 weeks |
| Dose | Dong Quai root, 4.5 g/day |
| Primary outcome | Hot flash frequency and severity |
| Result | NO significant difference between Dong Quai and placebo |
| Secondary outcomes | No effect on endometrial thickness, vaginal maturation index, FSH, or estradiol |
| Conclusion | Dong Quai as monotherapy does not produce estrogen-like responses and is not useful for menopausal symptoms |
Other Evidence
| Study Type | Finding |
|---|---|
| TCM combination formula studies | Some positive results, but Dong Quai not tested in isolation |
| In vitro estrogenic studies | Mixed results; some binding, some negative |
| Animal studies | Various pharmacological effects demonstrated |
| Observational/case series | Anecdotal positive reports, subject to bias |
Evidence Assessment
- Single adequate RCT: Negative for the primary marketed indication (menopause)
- No adequate RCTs for dysmenorrhea as monotherapy
- Combination formula evidence cannot be attributed to Dong Quai alone
- Represents the weakest evidence base among the seven herbs reviewed
European vs. US/Anglophone Consensus
| Aspect | European Consensus | US/Anglophone Consensus |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory status | REJECTED by EMA/HMPC; food supplement only | Dietary supplement (FDA); NCCIH notes “very little research” |
| Clinical evidence | Insufficient for monograph | Similarly assessed as lacking evidence |
| Clinical recommendation | Not recommended by European phytotherapy authorities | Not recommended by evidence-based medicine; used in integrative/naturopathic practice |
| TCM context | Acknowledged as TCM herb but not validated in European framework | Greater cultural familiarity with TCM; more widespread use |
| Safety concern | Highlighted in EMA rejection; coumarin content | Warfarin interaction well-known; MSKCC warns about anticoagulant potentiation |
The TCM vs. Evidence-Based Phytotherapy Tension
- In TCM, Dong Quai is almost never used alone; it is part of complex multi-herb formulas
- European evidence-based phytotherapy evaluates single-herb efficacy
- This methodological mismatch may partly explain the negative clinical trial result
- However, even within TCM, the evidence for formula-level efficacy is limited by modern standards
Safety Profile
Contraindications
- Known hypersensitivity to Angelica sinensis or Apiaceae
- Anticoagulant therapy: Absolute contraindication — documented potentiation of warfarin
- Bleeding disorders: Anticoagulant and antiplatelet activity
- Planned surgery: Discontinue at least 2 weeks before surgical procedures
- Hormone-sensitive conditions: Precautionary avoidance (unconfirmed estrogenic activity)
Drug Interactions — SIGNIFICANT
| Drug/Class | Interaction | Severity | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warfarin | Potentiation of anticoagulant effect; INR doubled in case report | HIGH | Case report (Page & Lawrence, 1999): 46-year-old woman, INR >2x elevation after 4 weeks concurrent use |
| Other anticoagulants (heparin, enoxaparin) | Theoretical additive bleeding risk | Moderate | Pharmacological rationale |
| Antiplatelet drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel) | Theoretical additive bleeding risk | Moderate | Pharmacological rationale (ferulic acid, coumarins) |
| NSAIDs | Increased bleeding risk | Moderate | Additive antiplatelet effects |
| Thrombolytics | Increased bleeding risk | High | Pharmacological rationale |
| Some cephalosporins | Increased bleeding risk (those with anticoagulant activity) | Low-Moderate | Theoretical |
| Valproate | Possible increased bleeding | Low | Theoretical |
Side Effects
- Gastrointestinal: burping, gas, bloating
- Photosensitivity: Furanocoumarins (psoralen, bergapten) can cause phototoxic reactions; increased UV sensitivity
- Elevated blood pressure (reported but uncommon)
- Skin rash (rare)
- Heavy menstrual bleeding (if used in menstruating women — consistent with anticoagulant effect)
Pregnancy and Lactation
- Pregnancy: Contraindicated — uterotonic potential, anticoagulant activity, furanocoumarin content
- Lactation: Not recommended — insufficient safety data
- Fertility: No established benefit; safety in preconception period uncertain
Toxicological Concerns (Cited in EMA Rejection)
- Furanocoumarins: Photosensitizing and potentially photocarcinogenic with UV exposure
- Coumarins: Anticoagulant activity at pharmacologically relevant doses
- Safrole: Trace amounts of safrole (a known hepatocarcinogen) have been detected in some Angelica species [NEEDS-RESEARCH for A. sinensis specifically]
Clinical Dosage
Traditional Dosage Forms
| Form | Daily Dose | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Crude root (decoction) | 3-15 g/day | TCM traditional form; typically in combination |
| Dried root powder | 3-4.5 g/day in divided doses | Western encapsulated form |
| Tincture/extract | 1 mL (20-40 drops) three times daily | Ethanolic extracts |
| Standardized extract | 75-500 mg, up to 6 times daily (combination preparations) | Highly variable |
Important Notes on Dosage
- No standardized extract with clinical validation exists (unlike Remifemin for Black Cohosh or Ze 440 for Vitex)
- TCM dosing is formula-dependent and prescribed by practitioners, not self-administered
- Western supplement dosing is empirical, not evidence-based
- Maximum duration: 6 months suggested for supplement use (though this is arbitrary)
Connections
- Represents the polar opposite of Black Cohosh and Vitex Chasteberry in terms of European regulatory validation
- Anticoagulant interactions are the most clinically important safety finding; compare with the milder anticoagulant concerns for Evening Primrose Oil and Red Clover
- For menstrual disorder indications, Vitex Chasteberry has far superior evidence
Related Herbs
Black Cohosh
Actaea racemosa / Cimicifuga racemosa
Black Cohosh is the best-studied herbal medicine for menopausal vasomotor symptoms in the European phytotherapy tradition. It holds "well-established use" status from the EMA/HMPC, a positive Commission E monograph, and an ESCOP monograph. The primary commercial product, Remifemin (isopropanolic extract, 40 mg/day), has demonstrated efficacy comparable to low-dose conjugated estrogens in some trials. The mechanism is non-estrogenic, acting through serotonergic, dopaminergic, and GABAergic pathways. The hepatotoxicity debate, which generated significant regulatory concern in the mid-2000s, has been largely resolved: rigorous causality assessments found no probable causal link in the vast majority of reported cases, with product adulteration and confounding factors implicated instead.
Evening Primrose Oil
Oenothera biennis
Evening Primrose Oil is one of the most widely used supplements for women's health, particularly for PMS and cyclical mastalgia. However, there is a notable gap between its consumer popularity and the strength of clinical evidence. The EMA/HMPC has granted only "traditional use" status, and only for dry skin conditions -- not for PMS or mastalgia. The active compound is gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), an omega-6 fatty acid precursor to anti-inflammatory prostaglandins. While some individual trials show positive results for mastalgia and PMS, systematic reviews and meta-analyses present mixed findings. The Cochrane review found insufficient evidence for atopic dermatitis. EPO represents a case where traditional reputation and consumer demand have outpaced scientific validation.
Red Clover
Trifolium pratense
Red Clover is a significant source of isoflavones (formononetin, biochanin A, genistein, daidzein) used primarily for menopausal hot flashes. Unlike soy isoflavones, Red Clover contains higher proportions of the methylated isoflavones formononetin and biochanin A. Meta-analyses show a statistically significant reduction in hot flash frequency (-1.73/day vs. placebo), with best results at doses of 80+ mg isoflavones/day for 12+ weeks. However, formal European regulatory recognition is limited -- there is no Commission E or ESCOP monograph specifically for menopausal use, and the EMA assessment is not as developed as for Black Cohosh or Vitex. Promensil is the most studied commercial product. Safety appears acceptable for up to 2 years, but uncertainty persists regarding use in hormone-sensitive cancers.