Red Vine Leaf
Vitis vinifera
Evidence Rating
Confidence Level
Traditions
Last Updated
Summary
Red vine leaf extract (AS 195, marketed as Antistax) is a flavonoid-rich phytomedicine used for mild-to-moderate chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). Standardized to quercetin-3-O-beta-glucuronide, it has demonstrated significant edema reduction and symptom improvement in multiple RCTs at doses of 360-720 mg/day. The EMA/HMPC has granted traditional use status. It represents a well-tolerated option for early-stage CVI that has been marketed in France for over 70 years and is now available across multiple European countries.
Drug Interactions
This herb has significant drug interactions. Do not use if you are taking medications without consulting a healthcare provider first. See detailed interaction information below.
Regulatory Status
| Regulatory Body | Status |
|---|---|
| Commission E (Germany) | âś“ Approved |
| ESCOP (European) | âś“ Approved |
| EMA/HMPC (EU) | âś“ Approved |
Metadata
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Common Names | Red vine leaf, Weinlaub (German), Feuille de vigne rouge (French), Foglia di vite rossa (Italian) |
| Botanical Name | Vitis vinifera L. |
| Plant Family | Vitaceae |
| Part Used | Leaf (Vitis viniferae folium) — specifically leaves of dark-red grape varieties harvested in autumn |
| Evidence Quality Rating | MEDIUM — Multiple RCTs with the specific AS 195 extract; systematic review; EMA/HMPC traditional use monograph |
Approved Indications
Commission E (Germany)
- No specific Commission E monograph for Vitis vinifera folium was issued during the Commission E era (1978-1994)
- The product entered the German market later than the Commission E monograph period for this indication
ESCOP Monograph
- No dedicated ESCOP monograph for red vine leaf at time of research [NEEDS-RESEARCH — may have been published since last check]
EMA/HMPC
- Traditional use registration: EMA published Assessment Report and European Union Herbal Monograph on Vitis vinifera L., folium
- Indication: Traditional herbal medicinal product for relief of symptoms of discomfort and heaviness of legs related to minor venous circulatory disturbances
- Traditional use recognized based on >70 years of use in France and subsequent marketing across EU
Agreement/Disagreement Between Bodies
- Red vine leaf is a newer entrant to the formal European phytotherapy system compared to horse chestnut or butcher’s broom
- The EMA/HMPC granted only traditional use status (not “well-established use”), meaning the clinical evidence, while positive, did not meet the higher regulatory threshold
- This is somewhat at odds with the available clinical trial data, which includes well-designed RCTs [CONTESTED]
Conditions Treated
Primary (evidence-based)
- Chronic venous insufficiency stages I-II (Widmer classification)
- Lower leg edema
- Feeling of heaviness and tiredness in legs
- Sensation of tension in legs
- Tingling in legs
- Pain associated with venous insufficiency
Secondary
- Improvement of cutaneous microcirculation
- Enhancement of transcutaneous oxygen supply in CVI patients
Mechanism of Action
Endothelial Barrier Preservation
- Active flavonoids accumulate in the venous intima (inner lining of veins)
- Preserve endothelial barrier function, preventing plasma leakage
- Inhibit the breakdown of the endothelial glycocalyx
Anti-inflammatory
- Inhibit the inflammatory cascade that drives CVI progression
- Reduce leukocyte adhesion to venous endothelium
- Anti-prothrombotic effects at the endothelial level
Microcirculation Enhancement
- Improve cutaneous microcirculation in affected legs
- Increase transcutaneous oxygen pressure (tcpO2) in CVI patients
- This mechanism has been demonstrated by laser Doppler fluxmetry in clinical trials
Anti-edematous
- Reduce capillary permeability (sealing effect)
- Decrease transcapillary filtration
- Clinically measured as reduced leg volume and circumference
Key Active Constituents
- Quercetin-3-O-beta-glucuronide: Main flavonoid — the primary marker compound for standardization
- Isoquercitrin (quercetin-3-O-beta-glycoside): Secondary flavonoid
- Additional flavonol glycosides and glucuronides
- The extract AS 195 is standardized to these flavonoid components
Clinical Evidence Summary
Pivotal RCT: Kiesewetter et al. (2000)
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Design | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled |
| Population | CVI stages I and incipient stage II (Widmer classification) |
| Sample Size | Not specified in available abstracts; multi-center |
| Interventions | AS 195 360 mg once daily vs AS 195 720 mg once daily vs placebo |
| Duration | 12 weeks |
| Key Results | Both 360 mg and 720 mg doses significantly reduced lower leg edema and circumference vs placebo. Key CVI-related symptoms improved to a clinically relevant extent. |
| Safety | Both doses confirmed safe |
| Publication | Arzneimittelforschung. 2000;50(2):109-117 |
| [Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10719612/] |
Microcirculation Study: Kalus et al. (2004)
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Design | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover |
| Intervention | Orally administered AS 195 |
| Key Findings | Significant improvement of cutaneous microcirculation and transcutaneous oxygen supply in CVI patients |
| Significance | Provided mechanistic evidence for clinical efficacy — the extract genuinely improves tissue oxygenation in affected limbs |
| [Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15293865/] |
Observational Study: Schneider et al. (2003)
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Design | 6-week observational clinical trial |
| Key Findings | Demonstrated edema-protective properties of AS 195 in routine clinical practice |
| Relevance | Confirmed that RCT findings translate to real-world clinical settings |
| [Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12785119/] |
Efficacy and Tolerability RCT: Rabe et al. (2011)
- Double-blind, placebo-controlled study
- Confirmed efficacy for leg volume reduction and symptom improvement
- Well tolerated with adverse event profile similar to placebo [Source: sciencedirect.com, EJVES]
Systematic Review: Defined et al. (2020)
- Reviewed all available clinical evidence for AS 195
- Concluded: “Red vine leaf extract (AS 195) can improve some signs and symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency”
- Identified improvements in: lower leg volume, calf/ankle circumference, tired/heavy legs, tingling, pain, tension [Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32314844/]
European vs US/Anglophone Consensus
| Aspect | European Position | US/Anglophone Position |
|---|---|---|
| Market presence | Antistax is a well-known OTC brand across Europe | Available in US as dietary supplement (Antistax brand); not widely known |
| Regulatory status | EMA/HMPC traditional use monograph; registered in multiple EU countries | Dietary supplement only |
| Clinical awareness | Known to pharmacists and some physicians as a CVI option | Virtually unknown to clinicians |
| Evidence perception | Accepted based on RCTs + long traditional use in France | Not in clinical consciousness |
| Historical context | Red vine leaves used in French traditional medicine for >70 years for “heavy legs" | "Heavy legs” is not a recognized clinical complaint in US medicine |
Safety Profile
Contraindications
- Known hypersensitivity to Vitis vinifera or any component of the extract
- No other specific contraindications identified in clinical trials
Drug Interactions
- No clinically significant drug interactions reported in clinical trials or post-marketing surveillance
- Theoretical: flavonoid content could theoretically interact with CYP450 substrates, but this has not been observed clinically
- The interaction profile is very favorable — one of the safest venoactive drugs
Side Effects
- Very well tolerated in clinical trials
- Adverse event rates similar to placebo
- Occasional: mild GI complaints
- Rare: headache, skin rash
- No serious adverse events reported in clinical trials
Pregnancy and Lactation
- Insufficient data — not recommended during pregnancy or lactation
- No specific safety studies in pregnant or lactating women
- Traditional use in France does not explicitly address pregnancy
Clinical Dosage
| Preparation | Dosage | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| AS 195 (Antistax) | 360 mg once daily | Minimum effective dose in RCTs |
| AS 195 higher dose | 720 mg once daily | Tested in RCTs; may provide additional benefit in some patients |
| Standard recommendation | 360-720 mg/day, taken as a single morning dose | Before breakfast with water |
| Duration | Minimum 6-12 weeks | Seasonal use common (spring through autumn in Europe) |
| Onset of effect | 2-4 weeks for measurable edema reduction | Subjective symptom improvement may occur earlier |
Key point: The evidence applies specifically to the AS 195 extract standardized to quercetin-3-O-beta-glucuronide. Generic “grape leaf extract” or “grape seed extract” products are NOT equivalent.
Sources
- EMA/HMPC Assessment Report on Vitis vinifera L., folium (Draft and Final versions)
- EMA European Union Herbal Monograph on Vitis vinifera L., folium
- Kiesewetter H et al. Efficacy of orally administered extract of red vine leaf AS 195 in chronic venous insufficiency (stages I-II). Arzneimittelforschung. 2000;50(2):109-117. [PubMed: 10719612]
- Kalus U et al. Improvement of cutaneous microcirculation and oxygen supply in patients with chronic venous insufficiency by orally administered extract of red vine leaves AS 195. Arzneimittelforschung. 2004;54(8):455-461. [PubMed: 15293865]
- Schneider M et al. Oedema protective properties of the red vine leaf extract AS 195 in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. Arzneimittelforschung. 2003;53(4):243-246. [PubMed: 12785119]
- Rabe E et al. Efficacy and Tolerability of a Red-vine-leaf Extract in Patients Suffering from Chronic Venous Insufficiency. EJVES. 2011;42(1):142-148.
- Defined M et al. Red vine leaf extract (AS 195) can improve some signs and symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency, a systematic review. Phytother Res. 2020;34(6):1243-1252. [PubMed: 32314844]
- Monsieur R, Van Snick G. Therapeutic approach to chronic venous insufficiency - clinical benefits of red-vine-leaf-extract AS 195 (Antistax). Pharmazie. 2019;74(4):193-200. [PubMed: 30940301]
Connections
- Compare with Horse Chestnut — stronger evidence base, different mechanism
- Compare with Butcher’s Broom — different mechanism (venoconstrictive vs anti-exudative)
- All three CVI herbs (horse chestnut, butcher’s broom, red vine leaf) represent the “venoactive drug” category