Pygeum
Prunus africana
Evidence Rating
Confidence Level
Traditions
Last Updated
Summary
Pygeum (Prunus africana) bark extract is a well-established European phytotherapeutic for BPH, with Cochrane review evidence from 18 RCTs (n=1,562) showing modest but significant symptom improvement. The standardized extract Tadenan has been a licensed medicine in France for decades. Mechanism involves anti-androgenic, anti-inflammatory (5-LOX inhibition), anti-proliferative, and bladder-protective effects. However, pygeum carries a unique ethical dimension: the tree is CITES Appendix II listed (since 1995) due to destructive bark harvesting in African montane forests, making sustainability a significant concern that distinguishes it from all other herbs in this collection.
Drug Interactions
This herb has significant drug interactions. Do not use if you are taking medications without consulting a healthcare provider first. See detailed interaction information below.
Regulatory Status
| Regulatory Body | Status |
|---|---|
| Commission E (Germany) | ✓ Approved |
| ESCOP (European) | ✓ Approved |
| EMA/HMPC (EU) | ✓ Approved |
Metadata
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Common Names | Pygeum, African Plum Tree, African Cherry (EN), Afrikanischer Pflaumenbaum (DE) |
| Botanical Name | Prunus africana (Hook.f.) Kalkm. (syn. Pygeum africanum) |
| Plant Family | Rosaceae (Rose family) |
| Part Used | Bark (cortex) |
| Drug Name | Pruni africanae cortex |
| Evidence Quality Rating | Moderate (Cochrane review basis) |
Approved Indications
Commission E (Germany)
- Not formally monographed by Commission E (pygeum was more of a French than German tradition)
ESCOP
- Published monograph (2020): Symptomatic treatment of micturition disorders in BPH
- Dysuria
- Pollakisuria (frequency)
- Nocturia
- Urine retention
- Stages I, II, and III (Alken and Vahlensieck classifications)
- Notably, ESCOP includes stage III — broader than most saw palmetto recommendations
EMA/HMPC
- EMA has conducted assessment of Prunus africana cortex
- Assessment report published evaluating safety and efficacy
- Classified for traditional use
- The EMA assessment concluded that “Pygeum extract is deemed non-toxic and suitable for long-term use for humans”
Agreement/Disagreement
- ESCOP: Positive, with broad indication covering BPH stages I-III
- EMA: Assessment report available; traditional use framework
- No Commission E monograph: Reflecting pygeum’s French rather than German origin in European phytotherapy
- France: Tadenan is a licensed pharmaceutical product; historically the primary European market
- US: Dietary supplement; Cochrane review acknowledged but not integrated into AUA guidelines
- Cochrane review: Positive, showing modest efficacy — this is the strongest independent evidence base
Conditions Treated
- Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) — symptomatic treatment of:
- Nocturia
- Pollakisuria (frequency)
- Dysuria
- Urinary retention
- Weak urinary stream
- Stages I-III (ESCOP) — notably including more advanced BPH than typically indicated for saw palmetto or nettle root
Mechanism of Action
Primary Mechanisms
-
Anti-Androgenic Activity
- Inhibition of androgen and progesterone receptors in prostate tissue
- Reduces androgen-driven prostate cell proliferation
- Beta-sitosterol and other phytosterols compete with endogenous androgens
-
Anti-inflammatory (5-Lipoxygenase Inhibition)
- Inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX) pathway
- Reduces leukotriene production in prostate tissue
- This anti-inflammatory mechanism distinguishes pygeum from saw palmetto’s primarily COX-pathway inhibition
-
Anti-proliferative Effects
- Inhibition of prostate cell proliferation
- Induction of apoptosis in stromal cells
- May directly reduce prostatic growth
-
Bladder Protection (Detrusor Effects)
- Histamine-mediated protective response to the detrusor muscle
- May improve bladder contractility and reduce irritative symptoms
- This mechanism is unique among BPH phytotherapeutics
-
Reduction of Prostatic Edema
- Anti-edematous effect on prostatic tissue
- May contribute to improved urinary flow independent of prostate size reduction
Key Bioactive Compounds
- Phytosterols: Beta-sitosterol (key compound; also studied as standalone BPH treatment), campesterol, stigmasterol
- Pentacyclic triterpenes: Ursolic acid, oleanolic acid — anti-inflammatory
- Ferulic acid esters: N-docosanol, tetracosanol — anti-edematous
- Fatty acids: Linoleic acid, palmitic acid, oleic acid
- N-butylbenzenesulfonamide [UNCERTAIN — reported as a constituent but may be a contaminant]
Clinical Evidence Summary
Cochrane Review (Wilt et al., 2002)
- Scope: 18 RCTs involving 1,562 men
- Results:
- Pygeum significantly improved BPH symptoms (p<0.001 to p<0.05)
- Self-rated improvement: Men using pygeum were more than twice as likely to report improvement (RR = 2.1)
- Nocturia: Reduced by 19%
- Residual urine volume: Reduced by 24%
- Peak urine flow: Increased by 23%
- Adverse effects: Mild and comparable to placebo; GI discomfort most common
- Limitations: Many trials were small, short-duration, and used varied outcome measures. Most predated IPSS standardization
- [Source: Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2002]
Meta-analysis (Ishani et al., 2000, Am J Med)
- Systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis
- Confirmed modest but significant improvement in urological symptoms and flow measures
- Total of 1,310 patients analyzed
Key Individual Trials
Tadenan Multicenter Trial
- Sample size: n=263
- Intervention: Tadenan 100 mg daily
- Result: Significant improvement in BPH symptoms
Tadenan 50mg vs 100mg
- Design: Multicenter trial comparing dosing regimens
- Finding: Both 50mg twice daily and 100mg once daily were effective
- Implication: Once-daily dosing is viable
Comparison with Other BPH Herbs
- Pygeum evidence is considered stronger than nettle root or pumpkin seed but weaker than hexane-extract saw palmetto
- Different mechanism profile (5-LOX emphasis) suggests potential for combination therapy
- Less studied than saw palmetto in head-to-head trials
European vs US/Anglophone Consensus
| Aspect | European Position | US/Anglophone Position |
|---|---|---|
| Historical home | France (Tadenan); spreading to Germany, Italy | Dietary supplement market |
| Regulatory status | Licensed medicine (France); ESCOP monograph; EMA assessment | Dietary supplement only |
| Prescribing | Prescribed by urologists in France and Southern Europe | Self-selected by patients |
| Cochrane evidence | Acknowledged and used in clinical practice | Acknowledged but not integrated into guidelines |
| Sustainability concern | Growing awareness; some manufacturers shift to cultivated sources | CITES compliance required for import; AHPA and US FWS active |
| Cultural status | Established pharmaceutical tradition | Growing interest but limited |
Safety Profile
Contraindications
- Known hypersensitivity to Prunus africana or Rosaceae family
- No other specific contraindications identified
- Suitable for long-term use per EMA assessment
Drug Interactions
- Finasteride/Dutasteride: Theoretical additive anti-androgenic effect; clinical significance unknown
- Anticoagulants: No specific interaction documented
- No significant drug interactions formally identified
- Considered to have a very favorable drug-interaction profile
Side Effects
- Mild and infrequent: GI discomfort (nausea, abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation)
- Frequency: Comparable to placebo in clinical trials
- No serious adverse effects reported in the Cochrane review
- Overall: Excellent safety and tolerability profile
Pregnancy/Lactation
- Not applicable (BPH is a male condition)
- No data on use in women; theoretical anti-androgenic effects would warrant avoidance in women of childbearing potential
Clinical Dosage
Standardized Dosage Forms
| Form | Dosage | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Standardized bark extract | 75-200 mg daily | Most studies used 100-200 mg/day |
| Tadenan (reference product) | 50 mg twice daily OR 100 mg once daily | Both regimens shown effective |
| Other standardized extracts | 100 mg daily | Standardized to total sterols (typically 14% triterpenes + 0.5% beta-sitosterol) |
Key Standardized Products
- Tadenan (Solvay/Fournier, France): The reference product; 50mg and 100mg capsules
- Lipophilic extract standardized to contain 14% triterpenes including beta-sitosterol
- n-hexane/dichloromethane extraction
- Pygenil (Indena, Italy): Standardized extract
- Various US supplement brands (variable quality/standardization)
Duration of Treatment
- Clinical trials used 1-4 month treatment periods
- ESCOP supports longer-term use for ongoing BPH management
- Minimum 6-8 weeks for initial assessment of effect
- EMA deems it suitable for long-term use
Sustainability and Conservation Concerns
CITES Status
- CITES Appendix II since 1995
- International trade requires export permits from country of origin
- All commercial imports must comply with CITES regulations
Conservation Status
- IUCN Red List: Classified as Vulnerable
- Populations declining in many African montane forest habitats
Harvesting Concerns
- Bark stripping: The primary method of harvest; sustained girdling (ring-barking) often kills trees
- Maturation time: Trees need 15+ years to reach harvestable size
- Annual harvest: Over 3,300 tonnes of bark harvested annually in the late 1990s
- Geographic source: Primarily Cameroon, Madagascar, Kenya, Democratic Republic of Congo
- Historical shift: From subsistence use to large-scale international commercial trade over 40 years
Conservation Actions
- Over 1,610,000 P. africana trees planted in Cameroon (1976-2007)
- Efforts to develop separate, traceable supply chains from cultivated stocks
- Some manufacturers (e.g., Natures Best, UK) have voluntarily stopped selling pygeum due to sustainability concerns
- US Fish & Wildlife Service has issued guidance letters to importers/exporters regarding CITES compliance
Ethical Consideration for Practitioners
- The sustainability issue is a legitimate clinical consideration when choosing among BPH phytotherapeutics
- Saw palmetto (cultivated/wild-harvested in Florida, abundant), nettle root (cultivated, abundant), and pumpkin seed (agricultural crop) do not carry comparable sustainability concerns
- Practitioners should be aware of the conservation dimension and may wish to preferentially recommend sustainable alternatives when clinically appropriate
Sources
- Cochrane Review — Pygeum africanum for BPH (PMC)
- Cochrane Review — Pygeum africanum (PubMed)
- ESCOP Monograph 2020 — Pruni africanae cortex
- EMA Assessment Report on Prunus africana cortex
- Ishani et al. 2000 — Meta-analysis (Am J Med)
- Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Pygeum (PMC)
- CITES — Prunus africana Documentation
- Prunus africana Overexploitation (PMC)
- IUCN Red List — Prunus africana
- US Fish & Wildlife Service — CITES Pygeum Notice
- Natures Best — Why We Don’t Sell Pygeum
Connections
- See Saw Palmetto for the most widely studied BPH herb alternative
- See Nettle Root and Pumpkin Seed for sustainable BPH herb alternatives